For courts, counties, and agencies
Daily accountability the court can rely on.
The Recovery Companion gives DUI and drug courts, probation departments, and county programs a defensible daily record of what a participant actually did, without asking your officers to chase it.
The monitor portal
What a supervising officer gets
A browser sign-in, a caseload, and an export. No new hardware, no app for your staff to install, and no phone calls to verify a meeting.
A caseload at a glance
Every participant assigned to you, with current standing and how the week is going, on one screen.
Sixty days of completions
A day-by-day grid per participant showing completed days, missed days, and authorized make-up days, each one distinguishable at a glance.
A compliance and effort report
Any date range, generated as a PDF you can attach to a filing. It covers completions, streaks, gaps, recovery activities, lessons finished, and reflections written.
The raw event log as CSV
Every recorded completion with its server timestamp, exportable for your own analysis or for the case file.
Two-factor sign-in
Officer accounts use an authenticator code in addition to a password, with rate limiting on sign-in attempts.
An audit trail on exports
Every report and every CSV pulled is logged with who pulled it and when, so access to a participant's record is itself a record.
Meeting attendance
The court card, without the lost card
A paper attendance card is filled in by the participant and signed by whoever chaired the meeting. The app does the same thing on the phone, and carries the same limits. Nothing here is presented as certified attendance.
The participant logs it
Fellowship, group name, in person or online, location, start time, duration. Nothing is pre-filled by us.
The chair signs on the phone
Whoever chaired types their name, optionally a phone number the court can call, and signs with a finger.
The server stamps it
Written to the same append-only log as everything else, and never edited or deleted afterward.
It prints, clearly labeled
In its own section of the report, headed "Meeting attendance (self-reported)", with the chair listed.
Meeting attendance (self-reported)
9 meetings recorded · about 10h 30m total. Five of the nine rows shown, from the sample report.
| Date | Fellowship | Meeting | Verified by (chair) | Signed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-23 | AA | Sunrise Group | Marcus D. | Signed |
| 2026-06-30 | NA | Back to Basics | Terrence W. | Signed |
| 2026-07-03 | AA · online | Noon Reflections | Alice K. | Signed |
| 2026-07-10 | SMART | Tools Group | Priya N. | Signed |
| 2026-07-17 | AA | Keep It Simple | — | No |
The unsigned row prints rather than disappearing, so an officer sees exactly what was and was not signed.
Say the limit out loud
What it is. A legible, dated, signed record with a chairperson contact, delivered in the same document as the daily completion record. It removes the lost card and the unreadable card, and it gives your officer a number to call.
What it is not. Independent verification. The signature is captured on the participant's own device. We do not contact meeting groups and we do not confirm a meeting took place. Every report we generate says exactly that, in plain language, on the page.
Why it sits apart. Attendance is kept in its own labeled section, outside the server-authored completion record, so nothing self-reported can be mistaken for something the server witnessed.
Why participants engage with it
The same record works in both directions.
A monitoring tool that only serves the court gets the minimum effort the court can enforce. This one is built so the participant has a reason to exceed it.
The compliance and effort report is objective, dated documentation of sustained work. A participant, or their attorney, can put it in front of a supervising court to support a request for early termination, reduced reporting, or a step down in supervision level. Effort keeps accruing after the 120-day program ends, because the app continues into a maintenance track, so the record can cover a full supervision term rather than the first few months.
That dual value is the engagement mechanism. It is also the reason participants tend to accept the tool rather than resent it.
The honest limit. Supervision relief is a judicial decision that varies by jurisdiction and by case. The record supports a request. It does not produce an outcome, and we will never describe it as if it does.
And a second one. Meeting attendance is captured with a chairperson signature on the participant's own phone. That is honest parity with a paper card, not independent verification, and every report we generate says so in plain language.
See the report before you decide anything
The compliance and effort report is the artifact your court would actually receive. Read a full sample and judge whether it would hold up in your program.
Participant record, full 120-day program
Privacy and confidentiality
Built to report effort, not to surveil a person
Substance use records carry confidentiality obligations that ordinary case management tools do not. The design starts there.
Completion data, not journal contents
By default a monitor sees that a participant journaled, not what they wrote. Access to written content requires separate, explicit, scoped consent rather than being bundled into enrollment.
Consent is recorded, versioned, and revocable
Who may see what is stored as a consent record with a date and the version of the language the participant agreed to.
Designed against 42 CFR Part 2
The confidentiality rules governing substance use disorder records inform the data model and the default disclosures. We are building to that standard and treat counsel review in your jurisdiction as part of any pilot, not an afterthought.
Retention and deletion per program
Retention windows are set per program, and the model supports the deletion and expungement requests that diversion programs routinely involve.
Where this stands
Built and in testing. Choosing our first counties now.
The participant app, the monitor portal, and the compliance and effort report are built and in testing. No county is running it in production yet, which is precisely why the first partners get to shape it.
We have no outcome data, and we will not claim any. An independent evaluation with a university partner is part of the pilot design, and we will publish what it finds, including anything unflattering. The pre-launch security review and the accessibility audit are budgeted and not yet complete.
If you need a vendor with a five-year track record and published recidivism data, we are not that yet, and we would rather tell you now than three meetings from now.
How a pilot works
Small, defined, and reversible
A first pilot is a handful of participants and one supervising officer, not a department-wide rollout.
What we ask from you
- One supervising officer willing to use the portal and tell us where it is wrong
- A small participant cohort, referred through your existing process
- Your requirements for what a report must contain to be accepted by your court
- A review by your counsel of the consent and disclosure model
What you get
- Direct influence over the report format and the portal, before it hardens
- A daily record on participants you currently have little visibility into between check-ins
- Participants who keep a tool free of charge after the program ends
- Findings from the independent evaluation, whatever they show
Start a conversation
Tell us the program you run and what your court requires in a compliance record. We will send the sample report and set up a walkthrough of the portal. No obligation and no sales sequence.
We reply in two business days
A person reads your note, not an autoresponder. If we are not the right fit for your program, we will say so.
You see the record first
We send the sample compliance report and a walkthrough of the monitor portal before anything else is discussed.
You decide the terms
If a pilot makes sense, we scope it around what your court already requires. Nothing is signed on a first call.
Prefer email? Write to info@healingnationsfoundation.org and put your county and program in the subject line.
What this is, and what it is not
Stated plainly so nobody discovers it late.
It is a compliance record, not a test. The app records what a participant completed and when. It does not perform drug testing, breath testing, or location monitoring, and it does not verify identity beyond the account sign-in.
It is not clinical treatment. Healing Nations Foundation is a wellness and peer-support organization. The Recovery Companion does not diagnose or treat any condition and is not a substitute for professional care or a crisis service.
Supervision decisions stay with the court. A record supports a request or a review. It does not produce an outcome, and we take no position on any individual case.
We publish no outcome claims. We have not run an outcome study, so we do not cite completion, recidivism, or abstinence figures. If that changes, the study and its limits will be published alongside the numbers.
The supervised tier is offered to courts, probation departments, and county programs. Revenue from that tier keeps the participant app free for veterans, active duty, National Guard and Reserve members, and first responders. Healing Nations Foundation is an Oregon nonprofit corporation.
See the participant app Who we are Privacy policy Get help now